Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Coley v. DOC Superintendent
as 2:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Blayne Jeffrey Coley
Respondent:
DOC Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00874
Plaintiff:
Jerry George Wood Jr.
Respondent:
Jason Bennett, Superintendent, Stafford creek Correction Center and Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Humphreys v. Coyote Ridge Superintendent et al
as 4:2023cv05052
Plaintiff:
Scott W Humphreys
Defendant:
Coyote Ridge Superintendent, Danunnle Ambruster, Larline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv06010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Montgomery v. LT Offender et al
as 4:2022cv05069
Plaintiff:
Tracy L Montgomery
Defendant:
LT Offender, Demaris, Gus Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Superintendent of Walla Walla Penitentiary et al
as 4:2021cv05140
Petitioner:
Kenneth J Moore
Defendant:
Superintendent of Walla Walla Penitentiary, Correction Officer 7819 and Correction Officer 7400
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01334
Plaintiff:
Bartholomew Lee Jones
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, John Does 1-99, SOTP Therapist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tudor v. Holbrook
as 2:2021cv00240
Petitioner:
Anthony Tudor
Defendant:
Superintendent Donald R Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore v. Ron Haynes, Superintendent of Stafford Creek Corrections Center
as 2:2021cv00217
Petitioner:
Don Arthur Moore
Respondent:
Ron Haynes, Superintendent of Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
