Cases 1 - 8 of 8
D.W. v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES et al
as 3:2021cv15789
Plaintiff:
D.W.
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GOODRICH v. THE NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANANCY et al
as 2:2015cv07821
Plaintiff:
TARA GOODRICH
Defendant:
THE NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANANCY , THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CELESTIN et al v. WEST DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2015cv07608
Plaintiff:
JEAN L CELESTIN and JESSIE CLAIRVIL
Defendant:
WEST DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP, STEVEN C SHIREY, JAMES GRECO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
G.H. v. SALEM HIGH SCHOOL et al
as 1:2014cv05200
Plaintiff:
G.H.
Defendant:
SALEM HIGH SCHOOL, SALEM CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, SALEM CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cross_claimant:
JONATHAN L. PRICE
Cross_defendant:
JOHN CYBER and SALEM CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MELENDEZ et al v. SHACK et al
as 2:2012cv01925
Plaintiff:
SHURANDA SHA-'KAARI MELENDEZ and A 'SIERRA GIIANNA SPENCER
Defendant:
GLORIA SHACK, MIGDALIA DIAZ, JOYCE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D.B. v. DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES et al
as 3:2012cv01559
Plaintiff:
D.B.
Defendant:
DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silverman v. The City and County of San Francisco et al
as 4:2011cv01615
Plaintiff:
Jacob Silverman
Defendant:
The City and County of San Francisco , Police Supervisory Defendant, Seth Riskin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
