Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 941
Keenan Wilkins v. USDC-SAC
as 23-70177
Not Classified By Court: In re: KEENAN G. WILKINS, PAUL GONZALEZ, S. PULLEY and others
Petitioner: KEENAN G. WILKINS
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
SWARTHOUT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09282
Plaintiff: JEFF SWARTHOUT
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Reinig et al v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv10663
Plaintiff: Tina Reinig, Gloria Grover, Mary May and others
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Macz-Cacao et al v. Swarthout
as 1:2023cv00296
Plaintiff: Mynor Jonatan Macz-Cacao and Walterio Winder Macz-Cacao
Defendant: Gerard J. Swarthout
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Shonda SwarthoutIn re: Shonda Swarthout
as 22-20427
Petitioner: In re: Shonda Swarthout
Swarthout v. Lumpkin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv02456
Petitioner: Shonda Swarthout
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willie Grant v. Gary Swarthout, et al
as 22-55291
Petitioner / Appellant: WILLIE ULYSESS GRANT
Respondent / Appellee: GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden, KAMALA D. HARRIS and RICK HILL, Warden
Swarthout v. Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
as 4:2022cv00768
Petitioner: Shonda Swarthout
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paul Johnson v. J. Beard, et al
as 21-16846
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee: J. A. BEARD, Director/Secretary of CDCR, D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, Warden of HDSP, J. PRICE, Warden, DVI and others
Jonathan Marvin v. Gary Swarthout
as 21-16573
Petitioner / Appellant: JONATHAN CARROLL MARVIN
Respondent / Appellee: GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?