Cases 1 - 10 of 15
SWEENY v. FORCE FACTOR LLC
as 2:2022cv07572
Plaintiff:
James Sweeny
Defendant:
FORCE FACTOR LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
LOMANTO v. SERA et al
as 1:2022cv06609
Plaintiff:
DAVID LOMANTO
Defendant:
VINCENT SERA, JAMES BENNETT, RICHARD CASAMENTO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
LEE v. SWEENY et al
as 2:2021cv00918
Respondent:
CINDY SWEENY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Petitioner:
JAQUAN JULIUS LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
IVESTER v. SWEENY et al
as 3:2019cv16559
Defendant:
GREG ORT, JOHN DOE WARDEN, MARCUS O. HICKS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL INVESTER and MICHAEL IVESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BASKERVILLE v. LANIGAN et al
as 2:2017cv05008
Plaintiff:
MARTIN LUTHER BASKERVILLE, JR.
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, JAMES T. PLOUSIS, GEORGE O. ROBINSON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
GLENN v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv03802
Plaintiff:
CHARLES GLENN
Defendant:
STEVE JOHNSON, GARY LANIGAN, ROBERT ROYCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLY et al v. LAGANA et al
as 2:2016cv08644
Plaintiff:
HAKIM KELLY and ANGELA KELLY
Defendant:
PAUL LAGANA, ROBERT CHETIRKIN, GEORGE ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
MACTIERNAN v. PROFESSIONAL RECEIVABLES NETWORK, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv03221
Plaintiff:
NEIL MACTIERNAN
Defendant:
PROFESSIONAL RECEIVABLES NETWORK, LLC , JEFFREY CORBETT , RANDY COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
CONNOLLY v. SWEENY et al
as 2:2016cv01574
Plaintiff:
SHAWN M. CONNOLLY
Defendant:
CINDY SWEENY, VELEZ, ENSO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
