Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Dubois v. Alves, et al
as 22-1704
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAUL DUBOIS
Plaintiff: NATHANIAL DUBOIS and ASHLEY DUBOIS
Defendant / Appellee: NELSON ALVES, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, CLAUDIA DUBOIS and others
In Re: Scott
as 19-1701
Respondent: UNITED STATES, CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and SALEM FIVE CENT SAVINGS BANK
Petitioner: MICHAEL DAVID SCOTT
US v. Scott
as 19-1506
Defendant / Appellant: MICHAEL DAVID SCOTT
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Interested Party: SALEM FIVE CENT SAVINGS BANK and CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
In Re: Scott
as 19-1160
Respondent: UNITED STATES, CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and SALEM FIVE CENT SAVINGS BANK
Petitioner: MICHAEL DAVID SCOTT
United States of America v. Besozzi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv11242
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Edward C. Besozzi, Kenneth G. Ouellette, Trustees of the Huntington Wood Condominium Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
US v. Scott We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2405
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: MICHAEL DAVID SCOTT
Interested Party: SALEM FIVE CENT SAVINGS BANK and CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv14727
Trustee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
People's United Bank v. Salem Five Cents Savings Bank
as 1:2014cv13619
Plaintiff: People's United Bank
Defendant: Salem Five Cents Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doherty, et al v. Salem Five Cent Salem Five Cen
as 13-1786
Plaintiff - Appellant: DONALD DOHERTY and CHRISTINA DOHERTY
Defendant - Appellee: SALEM FIVE CENT SAVINGS BANK
Sarkisian v. Salem Five Cents Savings Bank
as 1:2013cv00379
Plaintiff: Simon H. Sarkisian
Defendant: Salem Five Cents Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?