Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03063
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in Habeas Corpus: INS
Diaz v. United States of America
as 21-3141
Petitioner / Appellant:
Salvador Diaz
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv08687
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 mn
Diaz v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv02403
Plaintiff:
Salvador Diaz
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. Diaz
as 19-1895
Defendant / Appellant:
Salvador Diaz
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Brock v. The City Of New York
as 19-646
Defendant / Appellee:
Police Officer Salvadore Diaz, Shield No. 21953, Individually and in his official capacity, Doctor Alan Dudley Labor, Individually and in his official capacity, Doctor Herman Anderson, Individually and in his official capacity and others
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe 1-3, New York City Police Officers; Individually; and in their official capacities; the name John Doe being fictitious as the real names are not presently known, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kamilah Brock
Diaz v. Judge Advocate General
as 10-1112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Salvador Diaz
Defendant - Appellee:
Judge Advocate General of the Navy
Diaz v. Judge Advocate General of the Navy
as 1:2010cv01316
Plaintiff:
Salvador Diaz
Defendant:
Judge Advocate General of the Navy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Diaz v. Department of Defense et al
as 1:2008cv00370
Plaintiff:
Salvador Diaz
Defendant:
Department of Defense, Judge Advocate General of the Navy and Charles W. Dorman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
