Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Moore v. Findley et al
as 1:2017cv01067
Plaintiff:
Darryl Moore
Defendant:
Craig Findley, Gary Duncan, Daryl Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv04026
Plaintiff:
Larry Crawford
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Craig Findley, Ed Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salvador Diaz-Terrones v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-72820
Petitioner:
SALVADOR DIAZ-TERRONES
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Andres Adame, et al. v. Comtrak Logistics, Inc. et al.
as 5:2015cv02232
Plaintiff:
Andres Adame, Edgar Alejo, Edwin Alvarado and others
Defendant:
Dan Burke, Comtrak Logistics, Inc., Does and others
Salvador Diaz-Aguilar v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-3527
Petitioner:
SALVADOR DIAZ-AGUILAR
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
USA v. Jose Diaz-Benitez
as 13-10028
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE SALVADOR DIAZ-BENITEZ
AFLAC, Inc., et al v. Salvador Diaz-Verson, et al
as 12-14015
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AFLAC INC. and AMERICAN FAMILY CORPORATION, Retirement Plan for Senior Officers
Defendant - Appellant:
SALVADOR DIAZ-VERSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PORTER BRIDGE LOAN COMPANY INC.
Salvador Diaz-Hilario v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-72383
Petitioner:
SALVADOR DIAZ-HILARIO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Aflac Inc v. Diaz-Verson et al
as 4:2011cv00081
Plaintiff:
Aflac Inc
Defendant:
Salvador Diaz-Verson, Jr. and PORTER BRIDGE LOAN COMPANY INC
Cross_claimant:
PORTER BRIDGE LOAN COMPANY INC
Cross_defendant:
Salvador Diaz-Verson, Jr.
Counter_claimant:
PORTER BRIDGE LOAN COMPANY INC
Counter_defendant:
Salvador Diaz-Verson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Diaz-Verson v. Portor Bridge Loan Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01627
Plaintiff:
Salvador Diaz-Verson, Jr
Defendant:
Portor Bridge Loan Company, Inc. , Day Crowley, LLC and Bobby L Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
