Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Arunachalam v. McNamara
as 21-110
Respondent:
RAYMOND C. CLEVENGER, III, JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., TODD M. HUGHES and others
Petitioner:
LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM
Lakshmi Arunachalam v. Brian McNamara, et al
as 20-3290
Defendant:
THOMAS S. HIXSON, BRIAN J. MCNAMARA, RAYMOND C. CLEVENGER, III and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM
Amicus Curiae:
DANIEL BRUNE, SHERNA MADAN, M.D., FRED GARCIA and others
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. Edward LEAVY, et al
as 19-17031
Defendant / Appellee:
RUTH BADER GINSBURG, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, and as an individual, SAMUEL CONTI, Former District Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, and his estate, MARY M. SCHROEDER, and as an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUANG-BAO P. OU-YOUNG
Balistreri-Amrhein v. Verrilli, Jr. et al
as 4:2016cv00112
Plaintiff:
Darlene C Balistreri-Amrhein and Anthony J Balistreri
Defendant:
Donald Verrilli, Jr., Loretta Lynch, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Robert J Jaffe MD v. John G Roberts et al
as 2:2015cv01018
Defendant:
Samuel Anthony Alito, Jr., Stephen G Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and others
Plaintiff:
Robert J Jaffe
Sakli v. Deutsche Bank-Board of Governors et al
as 6:2012cv00567
Plaintiff:
Adnan Sakli
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank -Board of Governors, Bank of America Board of Governors, Wells Fargo Board of Governors and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
SIBLEY v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2010cv01696
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, JOHN G. ROBERTS, SAMUEL ANTHONY ALITO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lo v. Roberts et al
as 4:2010cv00119
Plaintiff:
Erlyndon Joseph Lo
Defendant:
John Glover Roberts, Jr., John Paul Steven, Antonin Gregory Scalia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
