Cases 1 - 10 of 38
ABRAM v. USA
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL ROY ABRAM
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Abram v. Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium, et al
as 1:2022cv01821
Plaintiff:
Samuel Roy Abram
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium and Federal Correctional Institution Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Alonzo et al v. Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium, et al
as 1:2022cv01588
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alonzo, Jaun Frausto, Bairo Cardona Perez and others
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium and Federal Correctional Institution Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Samuel Abram v. David Leu, et al
as 22-10019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL ROY ABRAM
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID LEU, Captain of Security, A. CLUNTZ, SIS Agent and K. BARKER, SIS Lieutenant
ABRAM v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE
as 3:2021cv01013
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL ROY ABRAM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Samuel Abram v. David Leu, et al
as 20-11177
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID LEU, Captain of Security, K. BARKER, SIS Lieutenant and A. CLUNTZ, SIS Agent
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL ROY ABRAM
ABRAM v. COLLIER et al
as 3:2020cv04291
Defendant:
MILES DAVIS, GREGORY R MILLER, STEPHEN P PRIESSER and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL ROY ABRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abram v. U S P Pollock
as 1:2019cv01481
Defendant:
Warden U S P Pollock
Plaintiff:
Samuel Roy Abram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Samuel Abram v. Steven Mnuchin
as 19-5065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Samuel Roy Abram
Defendant / Appellee:
Steven T. Mnuchin, Treasury Secretary
Abram v. USA et al
as 1:2018cv00415
Plaintiff:
Samuel Roy Abram
Defendant:
USA, A Boteler and Andrew Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
