Cases 11 - 20 of 171
Mendoza v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2023cv00048
Petitioner:
Amador Sanchez Mendoza
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Comstock v. Sanchez et al
as 3:2022cv05764
Plaintiff:
Deanna Comstock
Defendant:
Laura Sanchez and Emily Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03133
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America et al v. Sanchez
as 3:2022cv05416
Plaintiff:
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America and Pacific Northwest Regional Council of Carpenters
Defendant:
Juan Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Sanchez v. USA
as 4:2022cv05057
Petitioner:
Rosalio Emmanuel Sanchez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sanchez v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv05053
Plaintiff:
Olga Sanchez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Horntvedt v. Franklin County et al
as 4:2022cv05051
Plaintiff:
Lance Ray Horntvedt, Sr
Defendant:
Franklin County, Franklin County Corrections Center, Trios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Doe et al
as 2:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
Alberto Sanchez
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
