Cases 21 - 30 of 923
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv16710
Plaintiff:
Lily Marlene Lopez Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
McGillivray v. Brown County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2023cv01667
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lee McGillivray
Defendant:
Brown County Sheriff Department, Todd Delain, Joseph Baltimore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramses Alvarez-Sanchez v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-3305
Petitioner:
RAMSES ALVAREZ-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Marsh-Leigh v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv16416
Plaintiff:
Zoe Marsh-Leigh
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, Steve Berlin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Eric Blackmon v. Gregory Jones, et al
as 23-3288
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ERIC BLACKMON
Defendant / Appellant:
GREGORY JONES, JAMES SANCHEZ and EUGENE SCHLEDER
Whittenburg v. Lake County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Garrett Whittenburg
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, Warden, Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Chug A Lug, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv16191
Plaintiff:
Hugo Sanchez Gomez
Defendant:
Chug A Lug, Inc., Silken N. Patel and Chug A Lug, Inc. an Illinois corporation doing business as Chug A Lug Pub & Grill
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Whipple v. Rendon-Sanchez, et al.
as 2:2023cv00403
Plaintiff:
Mark Whipple
Defendant:
Miguel Rendon-Sanchez, KPO Logistics, Inc. and KPO Logistics Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
