Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Perez-Sanchez v. Hallmark Cards, Incorporated
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Ismael Perez-Sanchez
Defendant:
Hallmark Cards, Incorporated doing business as Hallmark Marketing Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Middleton v. Chatham County et al
as 4:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
Delano A. Middleton
Defendant:
Chatham County, Chief of Police of Savannah Police Department, Nickolas Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Sanchez-Leyva v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00121
Petitioner:
Gerardo Antonio Sanchez-Leyva
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone and Warden, FCI Fort Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanchez Veliz v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00067
Petitioner:
Jose Sebastian Sanchez Veliz
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sylla v. Kemp et al
as 2:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Ebony-Azizi Sylla
Defendant:
Brian P. Kemp, Georgia Department of Driver Services, Spencer R. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Embery et al v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv00134
Plaintiff:
Amy Embery and Payon Sanchez
Defendant:
United States of America
Rhodes v. McCloud et al
as 3:2019cv00014
Plaintiff:
Cedric Sanchez Rhodes, Ced and Ced Rhodes
Defendant:
Rodney McCloud, FNU Adamkiewicz and FNU Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00010
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Rhodes v. McCloud et al
as 3:2019cv00013
Defendant:
Rodney McCloud, Sergeant Watts, Counselor Whitt and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric Sanchez Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arreguin et al v. Sanchez
as 2:2018cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jose Gomez Lopez, Jose Lopez Gomez, Miguel Sanchez Cervantes and others
Defendant:
Manuel Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
