Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Johnson v. Johnson et al
as 1:2010cv00255
Plaintiff:
Chiffon E Johnson
Defendant:
Marland Sands, Mike Spaulding, Mike Andry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCain v. Spaulding et al
as 1:2010cv00250
Plaintiff:
Willie M McCain, Jr
Defendant:
Mike Spaulding, Marland Sands, Erin Sprunger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosenbaum et al v. Freight, Lime and Sand Hauling, Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00287
Plaintiff:
Margaret M Rosenbaum and Kent L Rosenbaum
Defendant:
Freight, Lime and Sand Hauling, Inc, Daniel V Myers, Werner Enterprises, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FERRELL v. KNIGHT et al
as 4:2010cv00058
Plaintiff:
TYLER S. FERRELL
Defendant:
CAPTAIN STEVE KNIGHT and LIEUTENANT ANDREW SANDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Stefanatos et al
as 1:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
Joseph W Reynolds
Defendant:
Mark Stefanatos, Mike Spaulding, Marland Sands and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Sands et al
as 1:2009cv00358
Plaintiff:
Chiffon E Johnson
Defendant:
Marland Sands, Mike Spaulding, Mike Andry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCain v. Spaulding et al
as 1:2009cv00330
Plaintiff:
Willie M McCain, Jr
Defendant:
Mike Spaulding, Marland Sands, Erin Sprunger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard v. Indiana State of et al
as 1:2009cv00282
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Richard
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Daryl Himelick, Chris Butche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TESCH v. MILLS et al
as 4:2009cv00012
Plaintiff:
ANDREW CHRISTOPHER TESCH
Defendant:
DARRELL MILLS, STEVE KNIGHT, SANDS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McMullen v. Myers et al
as 1:2009cv00010
Plaintiff:
Barry McMullen
Defendant:
Tom Myers, Mark Spitzer, Jerry Drook and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
