Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Mobley v. Jewish Family and Community Services et al
as 3:2023cv00516
Plaintiff:
Victoria Mobley
Defendant:
Jewish Family and Community Services, Janell Knight, Margaret Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mobley v. Jewish Family and Community Services et al
as 3:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Victoria Mobley
Defendant:
Jewish Family and Community Services, Janell Knight, Sandra K. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00047
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00059
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Watson v. Optima Recovery Services, LLC (PLR2)
as 2:2017cv00202
Plaintiff:
Sandra K. Watson
Defendant:
Optima Recovery Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Watson v. Jon Barry & Associates, Inc. (JRG1)
as 2:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
Sandra K Watson
Defendant:
Jon Barry & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Watson v. ARC Management Group, LLC (JRG2)
as 2:2016cv00300
Plaintiff:
Sandra K Watson
Defendant:
ARC Management Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Watson v. Mar-Joe Enterprises, LLC
as 2:2016cv00291
Plaintiff:
Sandra K Watson
Defendant:
Mar-Joe Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Watson v. Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc. (TWP2)
as 2:2016cv00115
Plaintiff:
Sandra K Watson
Defendant:
Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Watson et al v. Glover et al
as 5:2010cv00042
Plaintiff:
Sandra K. Watson, Sandra K. Watson, Marion Tracy Watson and others
Defendant:
Michael Glover, M.D., Women's Care of the Commonwealth and Ephraim McDowell Regional Medical Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
