Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Jones et al v. Unifirst Corporation
as 1:2014cv12181
Plaintiff:
Sandi Jones and Fred Jones
Defendant:
Unifirst Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baradarian v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv10225
Plaintiff:
Daniel Baradarian
Defendant:
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., Chris Garabedian, Sandy Mahatme and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Corban v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv10201
Plaintiff:
Mark A Corban
Defendant:
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. , Chris Garabedian , Sandy Mahatme and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Casey et al v. Target Corporation
as 1:2013cv13296
Plaintiff:
Winston Casey , Rick Hauss and Sandy Hauss
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Battista v. Corsini et al
as 1:2012cv11451
Plaintiff:
Sandy J. Battista
Defendant:
Michael Corsini and John Luongo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garay et al v. SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.
as 4:2010cv10916
Plaintiff:
Eddie Garay and Sandy Jiminez
Defendant:
SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Garay et al v. SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.
as 1:2010cv10916
Plaintiff:
Eddie Garay and Sandy Jiminez
Defendant:
SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
AMALGAM ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, ET AL v. LAL, ET AL
as 1:2009cv11601
Plaintiff:
AMALGAM ENTERTAINMENT, LLC and AMALGAM DIGITAL, INC.
Defendant:
SANDY LAL, SANDY LAL & ASSOCIATES, P.C., CATHERINE FANDINO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Battista v. Murphy et al
as 1:2009cv11406
Petitioner:
Sandy J. Battista
Respondent:
Robert Murphy, David Brouillette, Roger Parent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bouvier v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2009cv10865
Plaintiff:
Carla Bouvier
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Jim McGarrigle, Perry Lee Tavares and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
