Cases 1 - 10 of 1,217
Santiago v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Mario M. Bobadilla Santiago
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Bobadilla Santiago v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 1:2024at00363
Plaintiff:
Mario M. Bobadilla Santiago
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Martinez-Santiago v. Garland
as 24-2546
Petitioner:
AURELIO MARTINEZ-SANTIAGO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
(PC) DeLeon v. Phillips et al
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Vincent DeLeon
Defendant:
Bryan Phillips, J. Ervin, J. Sherman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago-Tito, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2322
Petitioner:
ELVIS IVAN SANTIAGO-TITO, SMITH JEAMPIER SANTIAGO-QUISPE, JUAN CARLOS SANTIAGO-TITO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Castaneda v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
Santiago Castaneda, Jr.
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
(PC) Duclos v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01034
Plaintiff:
McGhee Tony Duclos
Defendant:
D. Smith, J. Servin, S. Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Barrett Business Services, Inc. v. Colmenero, et al.
as 24-2032
Plaintiff:
BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
CHARLES COLMENERO, DENELL HOPKINS, SANTIAGO ALEJO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
