Cases 1 - 10 of 11
USA v. Santiago-Garcia
as 24-60157
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alan Giovani Santiago-Garcia
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
USA v. Garcia Sanchez
as 22-50156
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Oscar Santiago Garcia Sanchez
Garcia v. Wright National Flood Insurance Company
as 4:2018cv03648
Defendant:
Wright National Flood Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Santiago Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Gonzales et al v. Smitty
as 1:2018cv00756
Defendant:
Darrell Shane Smitty
Plaintiff:
Amalia Nemesio Gomez, Mr. Santiago Garcia Gonzales and Santiago Garcia Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KHI Liquidation Trust v. Garcia
as 4:2017mc00025
Plaintiff:
KHI Liquidation Trust
Defendant:
Santiago Garcia
Santiago Garcia Landeros v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-60826
Petitioner:
SANTIAGO GARCIA LANDEROS, also known as Oscar Maciel-Lopez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Texas RioGrande Legal Aid, Inc, et al v. Les Range
as 14-60111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID, INCORPORATED, doing business as Southern Migrant Legal Services and MIGUEL ANGEL DE SANTIAGO-GARCIA
Defendant - Appellee:
LES RANGE, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Mississippi Department of Employment Security
Texas RioGrande Legal Aid, Inc. et al v. Range
as 3:2010cv00406
Plaintiff:
Texas RioGrande Legal Aid, Inc. and Miguel Angel de Santiago-Garcia
Defendant:
Les Range
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cecil Cox, et al v. State of Texas, et al
as 10-20025
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CECIL C. COX, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Larry Louis Cox and ROBERT EARL COX
Defendant - Appellant:
SANTIAGO GARCIA, Individually and in his Official Capacity and JASON HARPER, Individually and in his Official Capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
