Cases 1 - 10 of 103
McCoy v. Saunders
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
James McCoy
Defendant:
M.D. Frank Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Saunders
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
James McCoy
Defendant:
M.D. Frank Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Progress Software Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Timothy Saunders
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation and Harris Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Shepherd v. Saunders et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Kernelius Marquis Shepherd, Sr.
Defendant:
M.D. Frank Saunders, Michael White, Angela N Chevalier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Rock Solid Precast, LP et al
as 4:2023cv03375
Plaintiff:
Geovanny Romero
Defendant:
Rock Solid Precast, LP and Bryan Saunders
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Saunders v. Petro-Chemical Transport LLC
as 3:2023cv01974
Plaintiff:
Dana Saunders
Defendant:
Petro-Chemical Transport, LLC and Petro-Chemical Transport LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Saunders v. Lubbock Sheriff's Office
as 5:2023cv00159
Petitioner:
Norman Saunders
Respondent:
Lubbock Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Saunders v. Lopez et al
as 5:2023cv00892
Plaintiff:
John F. Saunders
Defendant:
SGT. FNU Lopez, SGT. FNU Cruz, CMA Selma LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
