Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Mitchell v. Savaseniorcare Administrative Services, LLC
as 1:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Jayme Mitchell
Defendant:
Savaseniorcare Administrative Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. SAVASENIORCARE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01456
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LAMARTINA, INGA CRAREY, DAVID HUERTA and others
Defendant:
SSC BEVERLY HILLS OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, SSC OAKLAND FRUITVALE OPERATING COMPANY, LP D/B/A FRUITVALE HEALTHCARE CENTER, SSC CLINTON TOWNSHIP OPERATING COMPANY, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Terry Valentine v. Rehabilitation Center of Santa Monica Holding Company GP, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv05701
Defendant:
DOES 1 THROUGH 50, Inclusive, SavaSeniorCare, LLC, Mariner Health Care Management Company and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Valentine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Farfan et al v. SSC Carmichael Operating Company LP et al
as 5:2018cv01472
Plaintiff:
Naomi Farfan , Lollie Webster and Terri Richter
Defendant:
SSC Carmichael Operating Company LP, SSC Carmichael Operating GP LLC, SSC Carmichael Management Company LP and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Legaspi v. SSC Carmichael Operating Company LP et al
as 5:2018cv01391
Plaintiff:
Kristine Legaspi
Defendant:
SSC Carmichael Operating Company LP, Savaseniorcare Administrative Services, LLC and Savaseniorcare, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ROBERTS v. BROOMALL OPERATING COMPANY, LP et al
as 2:2016cv01504
Plaintiff:
MARK ROBERTS
Defendant:
BROOMALL OPERATING COMPANY, LP and SAVASENIORCARE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Smith v. Savaseniorcare Administrative Services, LLC
as 4:2013cv03585
Plaintiff:
Samantha Smith
Defendant:
Savaseniorcare Administrative Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
