Cases 41 - 50 of 94
Jackson v. Bazail-Sawyer et al
as 3:2017cv00490
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Jackson
Defendant:
Ms. Bazail-Sawyer, T. Robinson, Ms. Wuest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv11325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv11026
Plaintiff:
Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. and Make-Up Art Cosmetics Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zhao Yantao, Zixing Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Marlow v. Sawyer
as 3:2016cv01088
Plaintiff:
Robert Bentley Marlow
Defendant:
Vance E Sawyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barrows v. Larry et al
as 1:2016cv07882
Plaintiff:
Henry Barrows
Defendant:
C Larry, Major Sawyer, LT. Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Dickerson et al
as 1:2016cv04352
Plaintiff:
Abdul Love
Defendant:
Dickerson, Carr, Nickolas Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Watson et al
as 1:2016cv04234
Plaintiff:
Jokari Miller
Defendant:
Chief Ronald Watson Watson, Officer Michael Jones, Officer Marcella Sawyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Buccy et al v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 1:2016cv02218
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, RGH Enterprises, Inc. and Insulet Corporation
Plaintiff:
Melissa Ann Buccy , Sawyer Buccy and Cameron Joel Buccy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sawyers v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv11781
Plaintiff:
Gerald Sawyers
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
