Cases 1 - 10 of 66
AUSTIN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2023cv04132
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
NATALIE AUSTIN, EMANUEL AVERY, BARRY BARTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SAWYER et al v. AAA INSURANCE et al
as 2:2023cv03670
Plaintiff:
AARON SAWYER and MICHELLE WATSON SAWYER
Defendant:
AAA INSURANCE and CSAA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
RASPALDO v. SAWYER et al
as 2:2023cv02089
Plaintiff:
JULIEN VICTOR RASPALDO
Defendant:
STEPHANIE M. SAWYER, ROBERTO VALDES, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLARK v. SAWYER
as 2:2022cv03658
Plaintiff:
DORIAN CLARK and STEVEN JACOBS
Defendant:
STEPHANIE SAWYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MINOR v. SAWYER
as 2:2021cv02680
Respondent:
HONORABLE JUDGE S. SAWYER
Petitioner:
MARCHESU MINOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WARDLAW v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv01942
Defendant:
UNDERWOOD SELBY, MELANIE HARRIS, ELIZABETH ESTRADA and others
Plaintiff:
EXAVIER L. WARDLAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOMAN v. SAWYER
as 2:2019cv04308
Defendant:
KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER
Plaintiff:
DONALD HOMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS-SAWYER v. PRRC, INC.
as 5:2018cv04682
Defendant:
PRRC, INC.
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL HARRIS-SAWYER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SAWYER v. SMITH et al
as 2:2018cv02024
Petitioner:
BRANDON SAWYER
Respondent:
BERRY SMITH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSLYVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
