Cases 1 - 10 of 17
SCARBOROUGH v. GAINEY et al
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Joshua Scarborough
Defendant:
Sheriff EMERY GAINEY, Deputy Kaifa Tyson and Deputy Monica Herrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fiedler et al v. Rudisill et al
as 6:2023cv02083
Plaintiff:
Robert Fiedler and Muriel Fiedler
Defendant:
Michael Rudisill, Nancy Brandt, Ginger Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaffer v. Scarborough et al
as 8:2023cv00680
Plaintiff:
Shaun Shaffer
Defendant:
Jacob Scarborough and Grady Judd
Not Classified By Court:
Gregory P. Holder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00272
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1683
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02940
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1683
Langford v. Magnolia Advanced Materials, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05141
Defendant:
Magnolia Advanced Materials, Inc., Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, Erika Clarke Birg and others
Plaintiff:
Moses Langford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Langford v. Magnolia Advanced Materials, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv04327
Defendant:
Magnolia Advanced Materials, Inc., Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, Erika Clarke Birg and others
Plaintiff:
Moses Langford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mondy v. Magnolia Advanced Materials, Inc.
as 1:2018cv04989
Plaintiff:
Michael O. Mondy
Defendant:
J. P. Boulee, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, Magnolia Advanced Materials, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. City of Brundidge et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2016cv00182
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Brundidge, Don C. Dickert, Joseph E. Faulk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
