Cases 1 - 10 of 136
US v. Marshall Scarborough
as 24-4224
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MARSHALL RAY SCARBOROUGH
Scarborough v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Davant Scarborough
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., John Stankey and Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
Robert FiedlerIn re: Robert Fiedler
as 24-10273
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT EDWARD FIEDLER
Respondent:
MICHAEL RUDISILL, NANCY E. BRANDT, GINGER B. BOYD and others
United States of America v. Parker (Fox)
as 23-6409
Defendant:
DAVID PARKER, EUGENE BROOKS, STEVEN SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellant:
PAUL FOX, JONATHAN BAKER, Israel Chambers and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Christopher Pascoe v. Scarborough, et al
as 23-5910
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER PASCOE
Defendant / Appellee:
J. J. SCARBOROUGH, Jailer, ERNIE RUTHERFORD, Chief Deputy, JANET KAUFMAN, Deputy Jailer and others
US v. Marshall Scarborough
as 23-4414
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARSHALL RAY SCARBOROUGH
E. Thomas Scarborough, III v. , et alIn re: E. Thomas Scarborough, III v. , et al
as 23-2021
Petitioner:
In re: E. THOMAS SCARBOROUGH, III
Respondent:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA and JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL
Maurice Scarborough et al v. Robinhood Financial LLC et al
as 1:2023cv21572
Plaintiff:
Maurice Scarborough and Scott Schiller
Defendant:
Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC and Robinhood Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Maurice Scarborough et al v. Robinhood Financial LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02622
Plaintiff:
Maurice Scarborough and Scott Schiller
Defendant:
ROBINHOOD FINANCIAL LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC and Robinhood Markets, Inc.
E. Scarborough, IIIIn re: E. Scarborough, III
as 23-1284
Petitioner:
In re: E. THOMAS SCARBOROUGH, III
Respondent:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA and JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
