Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Scates v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Antaneaio Scates
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BERRY v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2018cv02674
Defendant:
DOE KELLY, WORTHMAN DOE, DOE HELBERT and others
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.Q. BERRY, JR. and EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CritSuccess v. Scates
as 1:2015cv02193
Plaintiff:
CritSuccess
Defendant:
Rex Scates
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Pat Scates & Sons Partnership v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01211
Plaintiff:
Pat Scates & Sons Partnership
Defendant:
Syngenta Seeds, Inc. and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scates Big Barn Partnership v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01209
Plaintiff:
Scates Big Barn Partnership
Defendant:
Syngenta Seeds, Inc. and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scates Partners v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01210
Plaintiff:
Scates Partners
Defendant:
Syngenta Seeds, Inc. and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Michael Scate
as 13-2268
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL D. SCATES
Darrell Scates v. Jason Cremer, et al
as 09-3276
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL SCATES
Defendant - Appellee:
JASON CREMER, Correctional Officer, in his individual and official capacity, DAVID LINGLE, Adjustment Committee Chairperson, in his individual and official capacity, SARAH JOHNSON, Administrative Review Board, in her individual and official capacity and others
Scates v. Cremer et al
as 1:2009cv01271
Plaintiff:
Darrell Scates
Defendant:
Jason Cremer, David . Lingle, Sarah . Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
