Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Guzman-Torres et al v. Rolon-Suarez et al
as 3:2018cv01562
Defendant:
Rose Doe, Jane Doe, Fulano De Tal and others
Plaintiff:
Jose R. Cabezudo-Marrero, Conjugal Partnership Cabezudo-Guzman and Marta R. Guzman-Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wynn v. Schmidt et al
as 1:2016cv10190
Plaintiff:
Michael Wynn
Defendant:
Harrison Schmidt and Gregory Lennon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess, et al v. Town of Foxborough, MA
as 15-2543
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL BURGESS, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, LINDSEY SCHMIDT, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated and PAUL WELDNER, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DUTTON, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
FOXBOROUGH, MA
Defendant:
EDWARD T. O'LEARY, in his individual and official capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weldner, et al. v. O'Leary, et al.
as 1:2012cv11771
Plaintiff:
Paul Weldner , Timothy Dutton , Michael Burgess and others
Defendant:
Edward T. O'Leary and Town of Foxborough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
