Cases 41 - 50 of 951
Phillips v. Ranger Oil Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv04547
Plaintiff:
Mary Phillips
Defendant:
Ranger Oil Corporation, Edward Geiser, Darrin Henke and others
Johnson v. Ranger Oil Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv04570
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Ranger Oil Corporation, Edward Geiser, Darrin Henke and others
State of Kansas ex rel Kobach, et al v. U.S. Department of Interior, et al
as 21-3097
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAC AND FOX NATION OF MISSOURI IN KANSAS AND NEBRASKA, IOWA TRIBE OF KANSAS AND NEBRASKA, CITY OF MULVANE, KANSAS and others
In re Lordstown Motors Corp. Shareholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2021cv00604
Nominal Defendant:
Lordstown Motors Corp.
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Cohen, David M. Cohen, Herbert Stotler and others
Defendant:
Keith A. Feldman, Martin J. Rucidlo, David T. Hamamoto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
California Crane School, Inc. v. Google LLC et al
as 3:2021cv10001
Plaintiff:
California Crane School, Inc.
Defendant:
Google LLC, Alphabet, Inc., XXVI Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Arcell et al v. Google LLC et al
as 5:2022cv02499
Plaintiff:
Mary Katherine Arcell, Keith Dean Bradt, Jose Brito and others
Defendant:
Google LLC, Alphabet, Inc., XXVI Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
OptumRX, Inc. v. Schmidt & Sons Pharmacy of Tecumseh, Inc.
as 0:2023cv00811
Petitioner:
OptumRX, Inc.
Respondent:
Schmidt & Sons Pharmacy of Tecumseh, Inc. doing business as Schmidt & Sons Pharmacy of Tecumseh
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
O'Dell v. Ranger Oil Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv03957
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Ranger Oil Corporation, Edward Geiser, Darrin Henke and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-314
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
