Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Schmitt v. Ryan et al
as 1:2024cv12300
Defendant:
Jeffrey J. Gonsalves, Lt Herrick, Mary Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schmitt v. Bowers
as 1:2023cv13203
Petitioner:
Thomas Schmitt
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden J. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Schmitt v. Franklin County House of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv30012
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Schmitt
Defendant:
Franklin County House of Corrections and Northwestern District Attorneys office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Prosight - Syndicate 1110 At Lloyds v. M. L. Schmitt, Inc.
as 3:2020cv30178
Defendant:
M. L. Schmitt, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Prosight - Syndicate 1110 At Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmitt v. Baker
as 1:2020cv10618
Defendant:
Governor Charlie Baker
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Schmitt et al v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
as 1:2017cv11960
Plaintiff:
Nicole Schmitt and Matthew Gillitzer
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmitt et al
as 1:2017cv11957
Plaintiff:
Nicole Schmitt, Matthew Gillitzer and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pendergrass et al v. Schmitt
as 1:2013cv10376
Petitioner:
Zonte Pendergrass
Respondent:
Richard Schmitt and Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Schmitt v. Maney-Correia et al
as 1:2012cv10017
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Schmitt
Defendant:
Shannon Maney-Correia, Kimberly Lyman, Malee Prete and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schmitt v. Corsini
as 1:2011cv10359
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Schmitt
Defendant:
Michael Corsini, Robert Murphy, Duane McEchern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
