Cases 31 - 40 of 99
Rosado v. Nichols et al
as 2:2017cv00195
Plaintiff:
Randal Rosado
Defendant:
Robert Nichols, Robert Denis Foley , III, Lee County State Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosado v. Nichols et al
as 1:2017cv20438
Plaintiff:
Randal Rosado
Defendant:
Robert Nichols, Robert Denis Foley , III, Lee County State Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mattera et al v. Haveman et al
as 0:2017cv60199
Plaintiff:
John A. Mattera, Mattera Asset Management, Inc. and Rhino Island Capital, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert Haveman, Elsa Prince-Broekhuizen, Bill Beckman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cimbler v. Labarga et al
as 1:2016cv23272
Plaintiff:
Saul Cimbler
Defendant:
Jorge Labarga, Patricia Jameson, Susan Marvin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2016cv61012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Moncrief v. Ashton Gardens Atlanta, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00282
Plaintiff:
Lauren T. Moncrief
Defendant:
Ashton Gardens Atlanta, LLC and Brad Schreiber
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-11869
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Burns et al v. Maxwell et al
as 8:2014cv02793
Plaintiff:
Richard Burns , Borden Deane , Leslie Jacobson and others
Defendant:
Lawrence W. Maxwell, Lawrence T. Maxwell, Century Realty Funds, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Macon v. Kest et al
as 6:2014cv01426
Plaintiff:
Meredith Macon
Defendant:
John Marshall Kest, Donald E. Grincewicz, Margaret H. Schreiber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv22069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
