Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Schwark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv00025
Plaintiff:
Billy James Schwark
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Denard v. Dixon et al
as 3:2025cv00993
Plaintiff:
Cameron R. Denard
Defendant:
Secretary Ricky Dixon, Secretary Rep C. Neel, Secretary Rep A. Johns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sampo et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11263
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Sampo, Nina San Miguell, Latricee Michelle Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SCHWARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv65634
Plaintiff:
ERIC SCHWARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHWARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv33680
Plaintiff:
KYLE SCHWARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHWARK v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv10537
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
Plaintiff:
ANGELINA SCHWARK
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schwark v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. (Canada)
as 2:2021cv10647
Plaintiff:
Ronald Schwark
Defendant:
Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. (Canada)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHWARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv56206
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MATTHEW SCHWARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHWARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv25083
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KYLE SCHWARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
