Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Damien Green v. Greg Grams, et al
as 12-1273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMIEN GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
GREG GRAMS, Warden, KURT SCHWEBKE, JIM DOYLE and others
Kendon Schwebke v. John Fayram
as 11-3660
Petitioner - Appellant:
Kendon Hauge Schwebke
Respondent - Appellee:
John Fayram
Padilla, Jose et al v. Grams, Gregory et al
as 3:2011cv00089
Plaintiff:
Jose R. Padilla and Natanael Rivera
Defendant:
Gregory Grams , Kurt Schwebke , Jerry Maier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodvine, Christopher v. Thorpe, Cynthia et al
as 3:2011cv00007
Plaintiff:
Christopher Goodvine
Defendant:
Cynthia Thorpe , Rick Raemisch , Suliene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green, Damien et al v. Grams, Gregory et al
as 3:2010cv00745
Plaintiff:
Damien Green, Timothy Crowley, William McDougal and others
Defendant:
Gregory Grams , Jim Doyle , Kurt Schwebke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodvine v. Thorpe et al
as 2:2010cv00993
Plaintiff:
Christopher Goodvine
Defendant:
Cynthia Thorpe, Rick Raemisch , Jeananne Greenwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matz, Shaun v. Raemisch, Richard et al
as 3:2010cv00668
Plaintiff:
Shaun Matz
Defendant:
Richard Raemisch , Gregory Grams , Janel Nickel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moton, Reginald v. Grams, Gregory et al
as 3:2010cv00666
Plaintiff:
Reginald A. Moton
Defendant:
Gregory Grams , Janel Nickel , Curt Schwebke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balli v. Wisconsin Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00067
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Balli
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department Of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Amy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schwebke v. Fyram
as 1:2009cv00070
Petitioner:
Kendon Hauge Schwebke
Respondent:
John Fayram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
