Cases 41 - 50 of 2,038
Scott v. A World of Taste Lounge LLC
as 1:2023cv05730
Plaintiff:
Dion Scott
Defendant:
A World of Taste Lounge LLC
DOWNING et al v. THOMAS et al
as 5:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
TAVERN DOWNING, SR, DOLLIE A DOWNING, TYLIA DOWNING and others
Defendant:
JESSES THOMAS, PAUL MCDUFFIE, JOEL PRESLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
The State of Georgia v. Nettles
as 2:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
The State of Georgia
Defendant:
Brian-Scott Nettles
Young v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv05691
Plaintiff:
Maurice Vincent Young
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Judge Ural Glanville, Judge Henry Newkirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05587
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
McPherson v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Brentrez McPherson and Royal High Chief Priest BaBA
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Tyrone Oliver, Jacob Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross-Richardson v. Fields et al
as 1:2023cv05349
Plaintiff:
Donna Ross-Richardson
Defendant:
Danny Lee Fields, Scott Haynie Trucking, Inc. and Berkley National Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
