Cases 71 - 80 of 1,220
Humphreys v. CCS Rose et al
as 4:2023cv05054
Plaintiff:
Scott W Humphreys
Defendant:
CCS Rose and Remaining Defendants Illegible
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphreys v. Coyote Ridge Superintendent et al
as 4:2023cv05052
Plaintiff:
Scott W Humphreys
Defendant:
Coyote Ridge Superintendent, Danunnle Ambruster, Larline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Pierce County Judicial System
as 3:2023cv05311
Plaintiff:
Scott A Harris
Defendant:
Pierce County Judicial System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkersmith v. Muffet
as 1:2023cv03044
Plaintiff:
Scott Isaac Hawkersmith, II
Defendant:
Jamie L Muffet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00502
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sorenson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv05239
Plaintiff:
Scott Sorenson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sonia v. Rainer et al
as 3:2023cv05220
Plaintiff:
Brooke Lyn Sonia, Brett Brooke Sonia and Brett David Sonia
Defendant:
Karie Rainer, Bruce Gage, Sara Kariko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00369
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
