Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Morgan v. Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00366
Plaintiff:
Anthony Morgan
Defendant:
Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Scott R. Ward, Martha G. Aronson and others
Jenkins v. Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02663
Plaintiff:
Shannon Jenkins
Defendant:
Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Scott R. Ward, Martha G. Aronson and others
O'Dell v. Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02293
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Scott R. Ward, Martha G. Aronson and others
WARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv37148
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A WARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norris v. Ward et al
as 3:2013cv03355
Plaintiff:
John V Norris
Defendant:
Scott A Ward, Simmons, Donald J Gish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schatz v. Republican State Leadership Co, et al
as 11-1437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. SCHATZ
Defendant - Appellee:
REPUBLICAN STATE LEADERSHIP COMMITTEE, CROSSROADS MEDIA LLC, PATTI HECK and others
SCHATZ v. REPUBLICAN STATE LEADERSHIP COMMITTEE et al
as 1:2010cv00528
Plaintiff:
JAMES M SCHATZ
Defendant:
REPUBLICAN STATE LEADERSHIP COMMITTEE , REPUBLICAN STATE LEADERSHIP COMMITTEE MAINE PAC , CROSSROADS MEDIA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LUNDY et al v. NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA INC
as 2:2009cv00318
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F LUNDY , DAVID FRASER , NEIL F SORENSEN and others
Defendant:
NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Scott Ward v. Nathaniel Quarterman, Director
as 09-50284
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTT GREGORY WARD
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Ward v. Quarterman
as 6:2007cv00394
Petitioner:
Scott Gregory Ward
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
