Cases 41 - 50 of 75
BERARDI v. THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv00137
Petitioner:
JOHN BERARDI
Respondent:
THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, SCOTT DODRILL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HICKS v. YOST et al
as 3:2009cv00123
Petitioner:
CLARENCE HICKS
Respondent:
JOHN YOST, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and SCOTT DODRILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ALBERT v. WARDEN JOHN YOST et al
as 3:2009cv00116
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ELVIN ALBERT
Defendant:
WARDEN JOHN YOST, JEFFREY TRIBATH, ROBIN GOLDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WYNN v. DODRILL
as 2:2009cv01917
Petitioner:
MACK WYNN
Respondent:
D. SCOTT DODRILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00360
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Perez v. Geza-Ganoe et al
as 1:2009cv00173
Plaintiff:
Julio Perez
Defendant:
Violette Geza-Ganoe, Helen J. Marberry, James Linden and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Blanchard v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2008cv02115
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Blanchard
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. Bennett, K. Dewald and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Crumby v. Martinez et al
as 3:2008cv01900
Plaintiff:
David Crumby
Defendant:
R. Martinez, Mr. Tanner and D. Scott Dodrill
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Guerrero v. DEWEY et al
as 3:2008cv01568
Plaintiff:
Fernando Escobedo Guerrero
Defendant:
DEWEY, Case Manager at FCI Allwenwood Medium, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Mitchell v. Dodrill et al
as 1:2008cv01414
Plaintiff:
Troy F. Mitchell
Defendant:
Scott Dodrill, B.A. Bledsoe, Troy Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
