Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Hinkle et al v. Beckham County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 5:2015cv00497
Plaintiff:
Laramie Sterling Hinkle and Jarrod Hinkle
Defendant:
Beckham County Board of County Commissioners, Scott Jay, Strider Estep and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Jay et al
as 5:2015cv00172
Plaintiff:
Vannessa Lynn Robertson
Defendant:
Scott Jay and Dana Bilbo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlisle v. Jay et al
as 5:2014cv01335
Plaintiff:
Jason Carlisle
Defendant:
Scott Jay and Diana Bilbo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medley Jr et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2011cv03510
Plaintiff:
James Medley Jr and Leon Medley
Defendant:
Stanley Louis Hill and Scott Jay Frankel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Bilbo et al
as 5:2011cv00246
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy Anderson
Defendant:
Diana Bilbo, Scott Jay and Beckham County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott MacKenzie v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-50824
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTT JAY MACKENZIE
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Scott MacKenzie v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-50825
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTT JAY MACKENZIE
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Roche-Morgan et al v. Royal Caribbean Cruises
as 1:2009cv20704
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Roche-Morgan, Carolyn Roche-Morgan and Scott Jay Morgan
Defendant:
Royal Caribbean Cruises and Royal Caribbean Cruises
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MacKenzie v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00050
Petitioner:
Scott Jay MacKenzie
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MacKenzie v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00052
Petitioner:
Scott Jay MacKenzie
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
