Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Halley v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00041
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Scott M. Halley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Micke v. Missouri State Highway Patrol et al
as 4:2020cv00954
Defendant:
Matthew Becker, Franklin County Sheriff's Department, Missouri State Highway Patrol and others
Plaintiff:
Scott M. Micke and Scott M. Arnold Micke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Purcell v. Odem et al
as 1:2020cv00101
Plaintiff:
Scott Purcell and Scott M. Crowley
Defendant:
Babara Odem and Melissa Plunkett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crowley v. U.S. Marshal et al
as 1:2019cv00198
Defendant:
Gary Stolzer, U.S. Marshal and Unknown Griffin
Plaintiff:
Scott M. Crowley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis, Jr. v. Payne
as 4:2018cv01534
Respondent:
Warden Stanley Payne and Stanley Payne
Petitioner:
Scott M Davis, Jr. and Scott M. Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
S&K Leimkuehler, Inc. v. Barcel USA, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00686
Defendant:
Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc., Scott M. Devita and Barcel USA, LLC
Plaintiff:
S&K Leimkuehler, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bishop v. Randolph County et al
as 2:2018cv00054
Defendant:
Moberly Regional Medical Center, Randolph County, Michaela Huber and others
Plaintiff:
Scott M. Bishop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Safeco Insurance Company of America v. Kincaid et al
as 4:2012cv00193
Plaintiff:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Scott M. Kincaid and Nancy K. Kincaid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ronshausen v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00577
Plaintiff:
Scott M. Ronshausen
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ross v. Certegy Payment Recovery Services, Inc.
as 6:2008cv03120
Plaintiff:
Scott M Ross
Defendant:
Certegy Payment Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
