Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Doe v. Mapleton Local School District et al.
as 1:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Mapleton Local School District, Mapleton Local School District Board of Education, Scott Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks v. Cocas et al
as 4:2017cv01512
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Donovan Cocas, Adrian N. Roe, McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Song et al
as 4:2017cv01513
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Soo Song, Robert Cessar, Mark R. Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Song et al
as 4:2017cv01511
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Soo Song, Robert Cessar, Mark R. Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Roe et al
as 4:2017cv01265
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Roe et al
as 4:2017cv01258
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. FRAM Filtration
as 3:2013cv00956
Plaintiff:
Scott Smith
Defendant:
FRAM Filtration
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
William Lane et al v Modern Poured Walls, Inc., et al
as 1:2010cv00455
Plaintiff:
William Lane, Phillip Simulcik and Jason Belfiore
Defendant:
Modern Poured Walls, Inc. and Scott Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Strait v. Modern Poured Walls, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01615
Defendant:
Modern Poured Walls, Inc. and Scott Smith
Plaintiff:
Bruce Strait, Bruce Strait and Bruce Strait
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Smith et al v. General Electric et al
as 1:2008gd50257
Plaintiff:
Scott Smith and Cindy Smith
Defendant:
General Electric, GE Healthcare, GE Healthcare AS and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
