Cases 21 - 30 of 174
Rucker v. Swanson et al
as 3:2022cv00714
Plaintiff:
Tony Rucker
Defendant:
Swanson, Jane Doe, Lana Nalewajka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00510
Plaintiff:
Lampton J. Turner
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Scott Thompson, Wexford Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott Thompson v. Sheriff, Pinellas County FL, et al
as 22-10754
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT THOMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF, PINELLAS COUNTY FL, SEAN GILROY, individually and RANDY SHEPHERD, individually
Williamson v. Thompson et al
as 3:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
Clarence R. Williamson, III and Mark Howard
Defendant:
Scott Thompson, Daniel Monti, Cassandra Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amaya v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2021cv01707
Plaintiff:
Daniel Amaya
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Scott Thompson, Jeffrey M. Dennison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gogins v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2021cv01201
Plaintiff:
Dorvell Gogins
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Scott Thompson, Bart Toennies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stinde v. Thompson et al
as 3:2021cv01108
Plaintiff:
Raymond Stinde
Defendant:
Scott Thompson, C/O Doer, C/O Tomshack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSS v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 5:2021cv00170
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RUSS
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, SCOTT THOMPSON, RYAN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew Ruiz v. Alberto Butalid, et al
as 21-2405
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW RUIZ
Defendant / Appellee:
ALBERTO BUTALID, R. SCOTT THOMPSON, JOHN R. BALDWIN and others
McIntosh v. Miller et al
as 3:2021cv00862
Plaintiff:
Dallas McIntosh
Defendant:
Jeffrey Miller, C/O Tomshack, Sgt. Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
