Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Martin v. Wilkes, et al
as 4:2017cv00209
Plaintiff:
Kendrick R. Martin
Defendant:
Scott Wilkes, Antonio Bass and Serena Chance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Wilkes et al
as 1:2017cv03214
Plaintiff:
Patrick Walker
Defendant:
Scott Wilkes, Betty McGraw, Ruth Sheldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ballou v. Augusta University Medical Center et al
as 1:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
Curtis Ray Ballou
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Scott Wilkes, Stan Shepard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griggs v. Davis et al
as 1:2017cv00089
Plaintiff:
Eugene Griggs , Christopher Varner and Cameron Maddox
Defendant:
Belinda Davis, Stan Shepard, Scott Wilkes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince et al v. Georgia Department of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2017cv02687
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tiger D. Prince, Timothy Adams, Nick R. Smith and others
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Pardons and Paroles, Stan Shepard, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ballou v. Augusta University Medical Center et al
as 1:2017cv02599
Plaintiff:
Curtis Ray Ballou
Defendant:
Augusta University Medical Center, Gregory Dozier, Scott Wilkes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WILKES
as 5:2017cv00262
Petitioner:
JOHN HOKE SMITH
Respondent:
SCOTT WILKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ANDREW v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2017cv00216
Plaintiff:
TODD ANDREW
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GREGORY DOZIER and SCOTT WILKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. WILKES
as 3:2017cv00069
Petitioner:
CLIFTON JAMES THOMAS
Respondent:
SCOTT WILKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reid v. Wilkes et al
as 1:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
Travion Reid
Defendant:
Scott Wilkes, Stan Shepard, Ruthie Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
