Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Broyles v. Bruce
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Scottie Broyles
Defendant:
Sgt. Johnny Bruce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Scotty Owens
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Johnson v. Monroe County Sheriffs Office et al
as 1:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Monroe County Sheriffs Office, Scottie Clark, Mr. McMillian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Monroe County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Monroe County Sheriff's Office, Scottie Clark, Mr. McMillian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose et al v. Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00382
Plaintiff:
Marvin Bradley Rose and Jennifer Rose
Defendant:
Vegasigns and Lighting LLC, Scottie Chunn, Diversified Commercial Builders, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Lamar County et al
as 2:2020cv00218
Plaintiff:
Georgio Rodriquez Scott
Defendant:
Scotty Shawburrow, District Attorney and Lamar County
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prewitt v. Mississippi Department of Correction et al
as 4:2019cv00171
Defendant:
Dr. William Brazier, Pelicia Hall, Scottie Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Prewitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Walls v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00007
Plaintiff:
Scotty Ray Walls
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
House v. Jasper County
as 2:2016cv00200
Plaintiff:
Scotty S. House
Defendant:
Jasper County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
