Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Sims v. Greenville, The County of et al
as 8:2015cv00359
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Allen Sims
Defendant:
Greenville, The County of, Dept of Public Safety, Scotty Bodiford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Jackson v. County of Greenville S.C.
as 15-6104
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT M. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF GREENVILLE SOUTH CAROLINA, SCOTTY BODIFORD, C/O Jail Administrator, J. QUINN, Officer and others
Camden v. Bodiford
as 8:2014cv04648
Petitioner:
Steven Blair Camden
Respondent:
Scotty Bodiford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wilson v. Bodiford
as 2:2013cv00199
Plaintiff:
Garcia Zenas Martelli Wilson
Defendant:
Scotty Bodiford, James Dorreity, Tracy Krien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00010
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wilson v. Greenville South Carolina, State of et al
as 2:2013cv00009
Petitioner:
Garcia Zenas Wilson
Respondent:
Scotty Bodiford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Eugene Thomas v. James Dorriety
as 12-7977
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES M. DORRIETY, SCOTTY BODIFORD, TRACY H. KRIEN and others
Floyd Granger v. Director Bodiford
as 12-7621
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLOYD GRANGER, a/k/a Floyd Randolph Granger, III
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTTY BODIFORD, GREENVILLE COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER AND HEALTH SERVICES, UNKNOWN MEDICAL PERSONNEL and others
Marler v. Greenville County et al
as 5:2012cv02525
Plaintiff:
Lynn S Marler
Defendant:
Greenville County , Scotty Bodiford , Katie Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Dorriety et al
as 1:2011cv01585
Plaintiff:
Eugene Thomas
Defendant:
James M Dorriety, Scotty Bodiford, Tracy H Krien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
