Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Bennington v. Sea Ray Boats Inc et al
as 8:2023cv01888
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bennington
Defendant:
Sea Ray Boats Inc and The Cincinnati Casualty Company
Not Classified By Court:
Dale R. Sisco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Rolly Marine Service Company v. M/Y WATER WORLD et al
as 1:2023cv21053
Plaintiff:
Rolly Marine Service Company
Defendant:
M/Y WATER WORLD, a 1999 45 foot Sea Ray 450 EB recreational Vessel, U.S. Coast Guard official number 1108667, HIN: SERP4576H900, her boats, engines, generators, tackle, rigging, apparel, furniture, fu, FUN BOAT RENTALS, LLC and M/Y WATER WORLD,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
RMK MERRILL STEVENS LLC v. M/Y LIFESTYLE, a 2002 41 Sea Ray Sundancer, Hull Identification Number SERF8691C102, Florida Registration Number 06898910, her engines, tackle, furniture, furnishings, apparel, appurtenances, perso et al
as 1:2022cv23093
Plaintiff:
RMK MERRILL STEVENS LLC
Defendant:
M/Y LIFESTYLE, a 2002 41 Sea Ray Sundancer, Hull Identification Number SERF8691C102, Florida Registration Number 06898910, her engines, tackle, furniture, furnishings, apparel, appurtenances, perso, Aaron Starks, an individual, in personam and CARLICHA Starks, an individual, in personam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Upson Family Trust vs. M/V Job Site III
as 2:2022cv00336
Plaintiff:
UPSON FAMILY TRUST
Defendant:
M/V JOB SITE III, a 2005 Sea Ray 550 Sedan, HIN: SERY1275D505, her engines, tackle, apparel, furniture, and equipment appertaining and belonging in rem, & DEVERE DENNINGS and CAROLE DENNINGS, in perso, M/V Job Site III, Devere Dennings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF JOSEPHINE CASTALDO, AS THE OWNER OF A 1996 SEA RAY 330 SUNDANCER, HIN SERP2864G596, FOR EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
as 1:2022cv02304
Plaintiff:
JOSEPHINE CASTALDO
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF JOSEPHINE CASTALDO, AS THE OWNER OF A 1996 SEA RAY 330 SUNDANCER, HIN SERP2864G596, FOR EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0185 PETITION FOR LIMITATION LIABILITY
Badawi v. Brunswick Corporation et al
as 8:2021cv01825
Plaintiff:
Sam Badawi
Defendant:
Brunswick Corporation, Sea Ray Boats, Inc. and MarineMax East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Lacross Marina, LLC v. M/V Unclaimed, a 63' Sea Ray 1994 Fiberglass Vessel, bearing USCG Official No. 1025018 and Hull ID No. SERY0093J395, her engines, tackle, equipment, appurtenances, etc., in rem, et al
as 4:2021cv10059
Defendant:
Joseph A. Colabella in personam., M/V Unclaimed, a 63' Sea Ray 1994 Fiberglass Vessel, bearing USCG Official No. 1025018 and Hull ID No. SERY0093J395, her engines, tackle, equipment, appurtenances, etc., in rem, and Joseph A. Colabella
Plaintiff:
Lacross Marina, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company agent of d/b/a Key Largo Harbor Marina and Lacross Marina, LLC a Florida Limited Liability Company agent of d/b/a Key Largo Harbor Marina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Lacross Marina, LLC v. M/V Unclaimed, a 63' Sea Ray 1994 Fiberglass Vessel, bearing USCG Official No. 1025018 and Hull ID No. SERY0093J395, her engines, tackle, equipment, appurtenances, etc., in rem, et al
as 4:2021cv10058
Plaintiff:
Lacross Marina, LLC agent of d/b/a Key Largo Harbor Marina
Defendant:
M/V Unclaimed, a 63' Sea Ray 1994 Fiberglass Vessel, bearing USCG Official No. 1025018 and Hull ID No. SERY0093J395, her engines, tackle, equipment, appurtenances, etc., in rem, and Joseph A. Colabella, in personam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Tuni Gap Enterprises, LLC v. Marinemax East, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00020
Defendant:
Sea Ray Boats, Inc. and Marinemax East, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tuni Gap Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dugan v. Brunswick Corporation et al
as 6:2020cv06664
Defendant:
Brunswick Corporation, Mercury Marine, Sea Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dugan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
