Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Rose v. Polis, et al
as 25-1414
Plaintiff:
DARRYL B. ROSE
Defendant:
JARED POLIS, COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MOSES STANCIL and others
Wells v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2025cv03190
Plaintiff:
Ronald L Wells, Sr
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, LaToya Hughes, Brittany Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose (PS) v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv02557
Defendant:
Sean Mitchell, Moses Stencil, Nicole White and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl B. Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell Jr. v. Timothy et al
as 2:2024cv01396
Defendant:
Timothy and Kayla Padgett
Plaintiff:
Sean Mitchell Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Peoples v. Colorado Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv02016
Defendant:
Colorado Dept. of Corrections, Sean Mitchell, Jeff Long and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Peoples, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montgomery v. Gerdjikian, et al
as 22-1126
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM MONTGOMERY
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN GERDJIKIAN, ADAM HUGHES, CHAD WARNER and others
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv40226
Plaintiff:
SEAN MITCHELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv35735
Plaintiff:
SEAN MITCHELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Montgomery v. Gerdjikian et al
as 1:2020cv03600
Plaintiff:
William Montgomery
Defendant:
Sean Mitchell, Chad Warner, Adam Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
