Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv08855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Universal Dyeing & Printing, Inc. v. Sears Holding Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv02386
Plaintiff:
Universal Dyeing & Printing, Inc.
Defendant:
Sears Holding Corporation, Sears Holdings, Inc., Sears Roebuck And Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Universal Dyeing & Printing, Inc. v. Sears Holding Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv02391
Plaintiff:
Universal Dyeing & Printing, Inc.
Defendant:
Sears Holding Corporation, Sears Holdings, Inc., Sears, Roebuck and Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Universal Dyeing & Printing, Inc. v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv02388
Plaintiff:
Universal Dyeing & Printing, Inc.
Defendant:
Sears Holdings Corporation, Sears Holdings, Inc., Sears Roebuck And Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
RIVERS v. KMART CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv01301
Plaintiff:
CHANTIA RIVERS
Defendant:
KMART CORPORATION , SEARS HOLDINGS MANAGEMENT , SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Daniel v. Nordictrack Inc et al
as 1:2009cv00108
Plaintiff:
Cecil Daniel
Defendant:
Nordictrack Inc, Icon Health & Fitness Inc, Sears Roebuck and Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Bialla & Associates, Inc. v. Sears Holdings, Inc.
as 3:2008cv03529
Plaintiff:
Bialla & Associates, Inc. and Bialla & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Sears Holdings, Inc. and Sears Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
