Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Second Amendment Fdn v. Bureau of Alcohol
as 23-11157
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Second Amendment Foundation, Incorporated, Rainier Arms, L.L.C., Samuel Walley and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity Director of the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives, United States Department of Justice and others
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 23-10718
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Blackhawk Manufacturing Group, Incorporated, doing business as 80 Percent Arms, Defense Distributed, Second Amendment Foundation, Incorporated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae:
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Incorporated, Gun Owners for Safety, Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund and others
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 23-10463
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Defense Distributed and Second Amendment Foundation, Incorporated
Defendant / Appellant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, in his Official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Reese v. Bureau of Alcohol
as 23-30033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Caleb Reese, Firearms Policy Coalition, Incorporated, Second Amendment Foundation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Steven Dettelbach, Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
VanDerStok et al v. Garland et al
as 4:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G Andren, Tactical Machining LLC and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach and others
Petitioner:
Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc. d/b/a 80 Percent Arms
Amicus Curiae:
Gun Owners for Safety, Jason Perry, Ryan Busse and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc. doing business as 80 Percent Arms, Defense Distributed, Second Amendment Foundation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Defense Distributed v. Platkin
as 22-50669
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Defense Distributed and Second Amendment Foundation, Incorporated
Defendant / Appellee:
Matt Platkin, Attorney General of New Jersey, In His Official Capacity
Defense Distributed v. Grewal
as 21-50327
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Second Amendment Foundation, Incorporated and Defense Distributed
Defendant / Appellee:
Gurbir S. Grewal, Attorney General of New Jersey, in his official and individual capacities
Rainier Arms LLC et al v. Bureau of Alcohol Tabacco Firearms and Explosives et al
as 3:2021cv00116
Plaintiff:
Rainier Arms, LLC, William Green, Samuel Walley and others
Defendant:
Jeffrey Rosen, Department of Justice, Acting Deputy Direct Regina Lombardo and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Reese et al v. Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms & Explosives et al
as 6:2020cv01438
Defendant:
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Regina Lombardo, Attorney General William P Barr and others
Plaintiff:
The Second Amendment Foundation, Caleb Reese, Joseph Granich and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0922
Defense Distributed, et al v. Gurbir Grewal
as 19-50723
Defendant / Appellee:
GURBIR S. GREWAL, Attorney General of New Jersey, in his official and individual capacities, JOSH SHAPIRO, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, in his official capacity, MATTHEW DENN, Attorney General of Delaware, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED and SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
