Cases 31 - 40 of 1,283
Plaquemines Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30028
Plaintiff:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor:
Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary
Defendant:
Chevron USA, Incorporated and Chevron USA, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Gulf Oil Corporation and the California Company
Plaquemines Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30030
Plaintiff:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor:
Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary
Defendant:
Chevron USA, Incorporated, as successor in interest to the California Company and Chevron Oil Company and Chevron U.S.A. Holdings, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Texaco Incorporated
Jefferson Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30031
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Parish and Louisiana State, ex rel, Parish of Jefferson
Intervenor:
Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary and Louisiana State, ex rel, Jeff Landry, Attorney General
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A. Holdings, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Texaco E&P Inc. and Texaco Inc., Chevron USA, Incorporated, as successor in interest to The California Company, Atlantic Richfield Company, in its own capacity and as successor in interest to Acro Oil and Gas Company-Division of Atlantic Richfield and others
Plaquemines Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30032
Plaintiff:
Plaquemines Parish and Louisiana State, ex rel, Parish of Plaquemines
Intervenor:
Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris and Louisiana State, ex rel, Jeff Landry, Attorney General
Defendant:
Chevron USA, Incorporated, in its own capacity and as successor in interest to Chevron Oil Company and the California Company, Chevron USA Holdings, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Texaco E & P, Incorporated and Texaco, Incorporated, Texas Company and others
Rodgers v. Edwards
as 23-30922
Plaintiff:
Gary Daniel Rodgers
Defendant:
John Bel Edwards, Louisiana Governor, James Lablanc, Secretary of the State, Mayor of New Roads and others
B. v. Russo
as 23-90042
Respondent:
B. B., by and through her mother, P.B., D. D., by and through his mother, P.D., E. E., by and through his mother, P.E. and others
Petitioner:
Stephen R. Russo, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health and Louisiana Department of Health
MacKenzie v. USVA Medical Center
as 23-40702
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth MacKenzie
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center DeBakey Hospital Policeman Conger 372, United States Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center Hospital Policeman Erazo 4643, United States Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center DeBakey Hospital Police Force Agency and others
USA v. Paxton
as 23-50885
Plaintiff / Appellee:
La Union del Pueblo Entero, Friendship-West Baptist Church, Southwest Voter Registration Education Project and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Ken Paxton, Attorney General, State of Texas, Jane Nelson, in her official capacity as Texas Secretary of State, State of Texas and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Republican National Committee
Betz v. LeBlanc
as 23-30857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rodrick Sheldon Betz
Defendant / Appellant:
James M. LeBlanc, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Corrections and Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Rodrick S. Betz
Morgan v. LeBlanc
as 23-30851
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Edward J. Morgan
Defendant / Appellee:
James LeBlanc, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Corrections, Raman Singh, Sherwood Poret and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
