Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Choice Hotels International In v. Anuj Grover, et al
as 14-3294
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
ANUJ GROVER, individually and as Secretary of SBQI Inc., ARJUN GROVER, individually and DHARAM PUNWANI, individually
David Everist v. United States Department of Ag, et al
as 14-35661
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID D. EVERIST
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE, DONNA MICKLEY, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR and others
Dominion Dealer Solutions, LLC v. Michelle Lee
as 14-1597
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOMINION DEALER SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE K. LEE, Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Hossein Mohsenzadeh v. Teresa Rea
as 14-1489
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOSSEIN MOHSENZADEH
Defendant - Appellee:
TERESA STANEK REA, Hon.; Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and MICHELLE K. LEE, Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
MacKay v. Crews
as 14-1566
Plaintiff:
Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant:
Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee:
Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others
Target Training International v. Michelle K. Lee
as 14-1764
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Target Training International, Ltd.
Defendant - Appellee:
Michelle K. Lee, Deputy Under Secretary for Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
MacKay v. Crews
as 14-836
Plaintiff:
Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant:
Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee:
Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others
Everist v. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service et al
as 1:2014cv00199
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States, Director Dayne Barron, City of Medford, Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
David D. Everist
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 183 Patent - Right to Compensation
MacKay v. Crews
as 13-4140
Plaintiff:
Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant:
Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee:
Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others
President and Fellows v. Teresa Rea
as 13-2094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE and E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
TERESA STANEK REA, Acting under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
