Other Statutory Actions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,263
Jefferson Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30023
Plaintiff: Jefferson Parish
Intervenor: Louisiana State, ex rel, Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary
Defendant: Chevron USA, Incorporated
Jefferson Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30022
Plaintiff: Jefferson Parish
Intervenor: Louisiana State, ex rel, Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary
Defendant: Chevron USA, Incorporated and Chevron USA Holdings, Incorporated, As successor in interest to Texaco, Incorporated
Plaquemines Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30028
Plaintiff: Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor: Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary
Defendant: Chevron USA, Incorporated and Chevron USA, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Gulf Oil Corporation and the California Company
Plaquemines Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30030
Plaintiff: Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor: Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary
Defendant: Chevron USA, Incorporated, as successor in interest to the California Company and Chevron Oil Company and Chevron U.S.A. Holdings, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Texaco Incorporated
Jefferson Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30031
Plaintiff: Jefferson Parish and Louisiana State, ex rel, Parish of Jefferson
Intervenor: Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary and Louisiana State, ex rel, Jeff Landry, Attorney General
Defendant: Chevron U.S.A. Holdings, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Texaco E&P Inc. and Texaco Inc., Chevron USA, Incorporated, as successor in interest to The California Company, Atlantic Richfield Company, in its own capacity and as successor in interest to Acro Oil and Gas Company-Division of Atlantic Richfield and others
Plaquemines Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30032
Plaintiff: Plaquemines Parish and Louisiana State, ex rel, Parish of Plaquemines
Intervenor: Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris and Louisiana State, ex rel, Jeff Landry, Attorney General
Defendant: Chevron USA, Incorporated, in its own capacity and as successor in interest to Chevron Oil Company and the California Company, Chevron USA Holdings, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Texaco E & P, Incorporated and Texaco, Incorporated, Texas Company and others
John Castro v. Andrew Warner
as 24-1040
Plaintiff: JOHN ANTHONY CASTRO
Defendant: SECRETARY OF STATE ANDREW M. WARNER and DONALD J. TRUMP
Intervenor: WEST VIRGINIA REPUBLICAN PARTY and STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
Old Republic Insurance Company et al v.McDonough
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff: Old Republic Insurance Company, Lease Plan U.S.A., Inc., Harbey Johel Gajeda and others
Defendant: Denis R. McDonough, In his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs and Denis McDonough
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Larry Bishins v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Ser
as 24-10008
Plaintiff: LARRY V. BISHINS
Defendant: SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Mesa Hills Specialty Hospital v. Becerra, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00459
Plaintiff: Mesa Hills Specialty Hospital
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?