Cases 21 - 30 of 302
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rico v. Secretary of CDCR et al
as 5:2023cv02122
Plaintiff:
Jorge Andrade Rico
Defendant:
Secretary of CDCR, H. Mosley, R. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Newsom et al
as 4:2023cv01997
Plaintiff:
Nathan Hill
Defendant:
Governor Gavin Newsom, State of California, Jeff Macomber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barron K. Simmons v. B. Arreguin et al
as 2:2023cv02777
Plaintiff:
Barron K Simmons and Barron Keith Simmons
Defendant:
B. Arreguin, M. Guzman, Warden R.C. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
