Cases 1 - 10 of 205
Jeffrey Gibson v. United States Congress & Senate, et al
as 24-1664
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY GIBSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CONGRESS & SENATE, TOWNSHIP OF SUSQUEHANNA, US 1952 SCHOOL TAX ACT LAW and others
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 et al v. Rubio et al
as 1:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America
Defendant:
Senator Marco Rubio, Senator Rick Scott, Senator Chris Coons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Emrit et al v. Roberts et al
as 1:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segreated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America
Defendant:
Hon. John Roberts, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Justice Samuel Alito and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 et al v. Rubio et al
as 3:2024cv00614
Plaintiff:
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America
Defendant:
Senator Marco Rubio, Senator Rick Scott, Senator Chris Coons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Emrit et al v. Roberts et al
as 3:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segreated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America
Defendant:
Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Justice Samuel Alito and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NUMBER P60005535 et al v. RUBIO et al
as 3:2024cv04655
Plaintiff:
PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NUMBER P60005535, RONALD SATISH EMRIT and PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE/POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE/SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (SSF) NUMBER C00569897 doing business as UNITED EMRITS OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SENATOR MARCO RUBIO, SENATOR RICK SCOTT, SENATOR CHRIS COONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1593
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE G. HANLON, in her official capacity as Monmouth County Clerk, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1602
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE G. HANLON, in her official capacity as Monmouth County Clerk, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1601
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE G. HANLON, in hr official capacity as Monmouth County Clerk, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1594
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk, MARY H. MELFI, in her capacity as Hunterdon County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
